Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B650 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics228% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B650 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '24 at 03:06
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$441
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 91.6
1-Core 188
2-Core 374
116% 218 Pts
4-Core 725
8-Core 1,074
112% 900 Pts
64-Core 1,722
107% 1,722 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 113%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$727
Gigabyte(1458 40E8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
228% Outstanding
Lighting 332
Reflection 320
Parallax 327
270% 326 fps
MRender 451
Gravity 273
Splatting 202
240% 309 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 228%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8FPK002T 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10932
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,504
Write 2,413
Mixed 1,740
563% 2,553 MB/s
4K Read 62.3
4K Write 239
4K Mixed 82.1
326% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,646
DQ Write 1,182
DQ Mixed 1,166
938% 1,331 MB/s
Poor: 277% Great: 587%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
27GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 121
Write 57
Mixed 42.3
80% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.6
159% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
164% Outstanding
MC Read 69.2
MC Write 52.3
MC Mixed 56.7
170% 59.4 GB/s
SC Read 50.6
SC Write 54.4
SC Mixed 51.8
149% 52.3 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 164%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 170 29.5" 1280 720 MSI3CB4 MSI MAG301CR
Typical GA-B650 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 756 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 419%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B650 AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $2,518
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback