HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics64.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive136% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 30 days ago, 29 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 28 days ago, 27 days ago, 26 days ago, 26 days ago, 26 days ago, 26 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 25 days ago, 24 days ago, 24 days ago, 23 days ago, 22 days ago, 22 days ago, 22 days ago, 22 days ago, 22 days ago, 22 days ago, 21 days ago, 21 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 20 days ago, 19 days ago, 19 days ago, 18 days ago, 18 days ago, 17 days ago, 16 days ago, 16 days ago, 15 days ago, 14 days ago, 13 days ago, 11 days ago, 11 days ago, 11 days ago, 10 days ago, 10 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 8 days ago, 7 days ago, 6 days ago, 6 days ago, 5 days ago, 4 days ago, 3 days ago, 2 days ago, 2 days ago, 1 day ago, 8 hrs ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8767
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221026
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 20:11
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100-$94
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 121
2-Core 226
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 584
58% 476 Pts
64-Core 572
35% 572 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
HP(103C 87A5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3718 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.4% Good
Lighting 82.5
Reflection 118
Parallax 80.3
67% 93.7 fps
MRender 78.9
Gravity 76.8
Splatting 63.4
59% 73 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60znv256g KIOXIA 256GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGHA4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 742 711 389 355 402 328 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 824
Write 683
Mixed 819
SusWrite 488
158% 704 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 63.6
4K Mixed 41.9
140% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 780
DQ Write 546
DQ Mixed 669
498% 665 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 136%
Great: 239%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
207GB free
Firmware: 0707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 65 71 71 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 55.2
Write 87.4
Mixed 88.9
SusWrite 68.2
56% 74.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.5
177% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 66%
WD Elements 2620 2TB
215GB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 72 71 72 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 92.4
Write 91.2
Mixed 68.4
SusWrite 70.7
108% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
162% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 64%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
201GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 36 36 36 37 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 58.7
Write 28.6
Mixed 15
SusWrite 35.6
42% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
57% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 52%
WD Elements 2620 2TB
206GB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 91 91 92 91 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 67.1
Write 67.8
Mixed 50
SusWrite 89.8
95% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.3
155% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 27.3
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 34.5
SC Mixed 25.1
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 23.5" 1280 720 VSCDE2E VX2452 Series
Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx Builds (Compare 5,514 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $398
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback