HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics64.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 30 days ago, 30 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 29 days ago, 28 days ago, 27 days ago, 25 days ago, 24 days ago, 23 days ago, 23 days ago, 23 days ago, 22 days ago, 21 days ago, 21 days ago, 21 days ago, 20 days ago, 19 days ago, 18 days ago, 18 days ago, 17 days ago, 15 days ago, 15 days ago, 14 days ago, 13 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 11 days ago, 11 days ago, 11 days ago, 11 days ago, 10 days ago, 9 days ago, 9 days ago, 8 days ago, 8 days ago, 8 days ago, 7 days ago, 7 days ago, 6 days ago, 6 days ago, 6 days ago, 5 days ago, 5 days ago, 4 days ago, 4 days ago, 2 days ago, 2 days ago, 2 days ago, 2 days ago, 2 days ago, 1 day ago, 1 day ago, 1 day ago, 22 hrs ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8767
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221026
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '24 at 12:44
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100-$90
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 103
2-Core 126
66% 104 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 453
43% 356 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
HP(103C 87A5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.6% Good
Lighting 83.1
Reflection 117
Parallax 80.3
68% 93.6 fps
MRender 79.4
Gravity 76.4
Splatting 62.5
58% 72.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60znv256g KIOXIA 256GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGHA4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 814 510 368 352 301 380 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 961
Write 1,340
Mixed 826
SusWrite 454
202% 895 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 38.6
124% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 767
DQ Write 457
DQ Mixed 604
452% 609 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 132%
Great: 239%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
207GB free
Firmware: 0707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 33 31 34 35 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 63.1
Write 99.3
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 35.2
54% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.1
77% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 66%
WD Elements 2620 2TB
209GB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 18 22 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 78.3
Write 79.5
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 20
75% 58 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
162% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 64%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
201GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 36 36 36 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
24.7% Poor
Read 50
Write 37
Mixed 26.3
SusWrite 35.5
48% 37.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 52%
WD Elements 2620 2TB
207GB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 55 48 60 53 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
24.1% Poor
Read 63.9
Write 31.2
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 52.1
60% 46.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
68.7% Good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 17.4
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 20.1
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 92.4
43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 23.5" 1280 720 VSCDE2E VX2452 Series
Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx Builds (Compare 5,530 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $395
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback