Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 148%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive213% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS ULTRA
MotherboardGigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra  (all builds)
Memory21.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 14:33
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$415
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 96.6
1-Core 144
2-Core 285
97% 175 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 997
95% 783 Pts
64-Core 1,529
95% 1,529 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
EVGA(3842 3755) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
152% Outstanding
Lighting 225
Reflection 271
Parallax 221
183% 239 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 154
Splatting 137
130% 162 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 152%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
695GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1454 805 819 818 820 699 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 1551
Write 1,718
Mixed 1,396
SusWrite 902
313% 1,392 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 56.5
197% 69.4 MB/s
DQ Read 935
DQ Write 659
DQ Mixed 811
602% 802 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 213%
Great: 276%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
20GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 120 123 121 132 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 387
Write 210
Mixed 199
SusWrite 121
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 73
4K Mixed 26.5
103% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 179
128% 160 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 166 168 169 168 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 96.5
Write 127
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 166
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
72% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 90%
Seagate ST9160314AS 160GB
39GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 47 45 45 44 44 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 60.5
Write 56.3
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 45
36% 49.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
115% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.7% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 15.4
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 18.8
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 51.9
77% 51.9 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 360 24.5" 1280 720 AUS25B5 ROG PG259QN
Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ULTRA-CF Builds (Compare 7,803 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra - $172

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $1,250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback