PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 24.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 164% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Gigabyte B250M-HD3 |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-B250M-HD3-CF (all builds) |
Memory | 9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170221 |
Uptime | 5.2 Days |
Run Date | Aug 26 '22 at 16:39 |
Run Duration | 216 Seconds |
Run User | THA-User |
Background CPU | 23% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
62.8%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 647 814 614 413 223 227 MB/s
|
164%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
397GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 145 131 144 154 156 MB/s
|
86%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
58.6%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 136x |
Core i7-7700Intel $100Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 95x |
Core i5-7500Intel $83Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 91x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 81x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 76x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 42x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 46% - Average | Total price: $170 |