Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507XI_FA507XI

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	33.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	387% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

14 days ago, 14 days ago.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507XI_FA507XI (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FA507XI
Memory	16.7 GB free of 24 GB
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230911
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 02 '24 at 21:48
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 1,649 User benchmarks, average bench 84% FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Memory 71 1-Core 145 2-Core 218 81% 145 Pts	4-Core 449 8-Core 836 77% 642 Pts	64-Core 1,187 74% 1,187 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 107%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M 1,815 User benchmarks, average bench 36% Asus(1043 23BD) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.70.06 Performing below potential (55^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.9% Below average	Lighting 39.6 Reflection 19.2 Parallax 57.2 32% 38.7 fps	MRender 15.5 Gravity 54.1 Splatting 58.9 37% 42.8 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 990 PRO with Heatsink 4TB 429 User benchmarks, average bench 485% 3.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 0B2QJXG7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2489 2543 2737 3364 3376 3372 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	387% Outstanding	Read 2,375 Write 3616 Mixed 2,755 SusWrite 2,980 665% 2,932 MB/s	4K Read 48.6 4K Write 76.4 4K Mixed 68.7 202% 64.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,366 DQ Write 693 DQ Mixed 1,301 894% 1,120 MB/s
Poor: 268% ↑ This bench: 387% Great: 635%
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB 5,198 User benchmarks, average bench 192% 387GB free Firmware: V3MA003 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1630 230 80 79 79 81 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	173% Outstanding	Read 1,653 Write 1,577 Mixed 1,365 SusWrite 363 277% 1,240 MB/s	4K Read 44.3 4K Write 78.1 4K Mixed 31.9 149% 51.4 MB/s	DQ Read 982 DQ Write 840 DQ Mixed 889 672% 903 MB/s
Poor: 124% ↑ This bench: 173% Great: 252%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT12G56C46S5.M4B1 2x12GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 120% 2 of 2 slots used 24GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	119% Outstanding	MC Read 39.3 MC Write 45.2 MC Mixed 40.7 119% 41.7 GB/s	SC Read 36.4 SC Write 57 SC Mixed 46.8 134% 46.7 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 114% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	56	144	15.5"	1280 720	AUOD2A2 B156HAN15.H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507XI_FA507XI Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 117%

UFO

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507XI_FA507XI

CPU
Ryzen 9 7940HSAMDBench 84%, 1,649 samples	35x

GPU
RTX 4070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 132%, 10,174 samples	26x
Radeon 780MAMDBench 36%, 1,815 samples	9x

SSD
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GBBench 192%, 5,198 samples	14x
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA1T0QFM 1TBBench 256%, 2,000 samples	5x
PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-1002 1TBWDBench 364%, 853 samples	5x

RAM
HMCG66MEBSA095N 2x8GBHynixBench 122%, 2,593 samples	14x
M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GBSamsungBench 120%, 26,893 samples	6x
HMCG78MEBSA092N 2x16GBHynixBench 133%, 3,659 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16