Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M6500XV_M6500XV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M6500XV_M6500XV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M6500XV
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '23 at 15:41
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Memory 54.5
1-Core 89.5
2-Core 169
58% 104 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 567
51% 431 Pts
64-Core 617
38% 617 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Asus(1043 3258) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.03.49
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 18
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 30.3
15% 20.4 fps
MRender 16.9
Gravity 24.1
Splatting 28.7
20% 23.2 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 552 582 549 793 165 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 1,147
Write 920
Mixed 960
SusWrite 450
195% 869 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 25.5
119% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 458
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 410
284% 360 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 124%
Great: 252%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MT62F1G32D2DS-026 WT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 42
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 31.5
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 1 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1556 N156HMA-GA1
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M6500XV_M6500XV Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M6500XV_M6500XV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback