Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA617NS_FA617NS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive455% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA617NS_FA617NS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA617NS
Memory53.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230615
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 22 '23 at 20:02
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Memory 72.9
1-Core 170
2-Core 330
100% 191 Pts
4-Core 634
8-Core 1,060
103% 847 Pts
64-Core 1,424
88% 1,424 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7600S
Asus(1043 231D) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.10.2
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Lighting 102
Reflection 164
Parallax 179
83% 148 fps
MRender 194
Gravity 117
Splatting 182
136% 164 fps
Poor: 74%
This bench: 101%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$135
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3051 3102 3086 3299 3290 3291 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
455% Outstanding
Read 2,761
Write 3,258
Mixed 2,935
SusWrite 3,186
687% 3,035 MB/s
4K Read 67.9
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 98.3
327% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,154
DQ Write 1,016
DQ Mixed 1,086
814% 1,085 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 455%
Great: 508%
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
309GB free
Firmware: V3MA003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1648 1623 1630 1623 590 80 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 1,763
Write 1,587
Mixed 1,341
SusWrite 1,199
331% 1,473 MB/s
4K Read 56.2
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 39.3
228% 90.1 MB/s
DQ Read 917
DQ Write 974
DQ Mixed 886
683% 925 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 252%
Great: 252%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G48C40S5.M16A1 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
129% Outstanding
MC Read 46.5
MC Write 51.8
MC Mixed 45.2
137% 47.8 GB/s
SC Read 27.9
SC Write 50.6
SC Mixed 33.3
106% 37.3 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 115%
This bench: 129%
Great: 163%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 165 16" 1280 720 BOE0B33 NE160WUM-NX2
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA617NS_FA617NS Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 FA617NS_FA617NS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback