Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507XI_FA507XI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507XI_FA507XI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA507XI
Memory16.2 GB free of 24 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230911
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 04:39
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 67.2
1-Core 182
2-Core 365
105% 205 Pts
4-Core 719
8-Core 1369
124% 1,044 Pts
64-Core 1,735
107% 1,735 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Asus(1043 23BD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Lighting 65.7
Reflection 20.5
Parallax 87.8
54% 58 fps
MRender 17.5
Gravity 82.6
Splatting 107
61% 69.1 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-1002 1TB
765GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 74104000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2334
Write 2,021
Mixed 1,690
448% 2,015 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 42.7
147% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,111
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 876
606% 774 MB/s
Poor: 232% Great: 510%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT12G56C46S5.M4B1 2x12GB
2 of 2 slots used
24GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
114% Outstanding
MC Read 47.2
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 40
114% 40.1 GB/s
SC Read 39.4
SC Write 51.2
SC Mixed 43.6
128% 44.7 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 114%
This bench: 114%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 165 15.5" 1280 720 SHP1574 LQ156T1JW05
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507XI_FA507XI Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507XI_FA507XI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback