Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507XI_FA507XI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
29 days ago, 29 days ago.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507XI_FA507XI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA507XI
Memory16.9 GB free of 24 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230911
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '24 at 20:30
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 71.2
1-Core 150
2-Core 256
87% 159 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 841
77% 648 Pts
64-Core 1,483
92% 1,483 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 78%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Asus(1043 23BD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.70.06
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
48% Average
Lighting 56.9
Reflection 19.1
Parallax 78.5
46% 51.5 fps
MRender 14.6
Gravity 74.5
Splatting 85.8
51% 58.3 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 48%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 PRO with Heatsink 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0B2QJXG7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1600 1747 1562 1788 1792 1796 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 1,288
Write 1,822
Mixed 1523
SusWrite 1714
360% 1,587 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 45.6
148% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 758
DQ Write 373
DQ Mixed 874
567% 668 MB/s
Poor: 268%
This bench: 228%
Great: 635%
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
387GB free
Firmware: V3MA003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1262 1347 150 79 79 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 1,210
Write 1,362
Mixed 1,042
SusWrite 499
231% 1,028 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 70.3
4K Mixed 27.4
126% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 748
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 790
513% 610 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 140%
Great: 252%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT12G56C46S5.M4B1 2x12GB
2 of 2 slots used
24GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
116% Outstanding
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 44
MC Mixed 39.4
116% 40.6 GB/s
SC Read 33
SC Write 55.1
SC Mixed 46.2
128% 44.8 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 114%
This bench: 116%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 55 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUOD2A2 B156HAN15.H
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507XI_FA507XI Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA507XI_FA507XI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback