Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 257%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 291%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics273% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 22 '24 at 01:28
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Memory 86.6
1-Core 146
2-Core 291
95% 175 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 1,115
100% 846 Pts
64-Core 2,189
136% 2,189 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-S (Super)-$965
PNY(196E 1418) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5750 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.12
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
273% Outstanding
Lighting 405
Reflection 397
Parallax 424
330% 409 fps
MRender 491
Gravity 366
Splatting 241
286% 366 fps
Poor: 283%
This bench: 273%
Great: 315%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Wd_black SN850 PS5 1TB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 615000WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,514
Write 3913
Mixed 2,811
763% 3,413 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 77.9
275% 98.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,189
DQ Write 921
DQ Mixed 1,039
782% 1,050 MB/s
Poor: 251% Great: 638%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
874GB free
Firmware: S0118C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 533 523 528 509 521 529 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 2190
Write 1,413
Mixed 1,234
SusWrite 524
297% 1,340 MB/s
4K Read 56.7
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 76.3
256% 89.6 MB/s
DQ Read 969
DQ Write 888
DQ Mixed 505
495% 787 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 240%
Great: 372%
PNY SSD2SC120G1CS175 120GB
76GB free
Firmware: CS11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 199 202 201 199 198 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 317
Write 264
Mixed 216
SusWrite 199
56% 249 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 6
20% 6.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 83%
Amd-raid Array 1 959GB
485GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 45 45 46 46 46 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 335%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
353GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 57 56 56 57 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 62
Write 47
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 56.3
39% 52.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 45.4
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 35.2
113% 39.6 GB/s
SC Read 26.2
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 34.4
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 107%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 160 27" 2560 1440 AUS2707 VG27AQ1A
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,093 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,007
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback