Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 227%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 254%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics261% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '24 at 21:14
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 83.2
1-Core 127
2-Core 255
86% 155 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 965
88% 737 Pts
64-Core 1,980
122% 1,980 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-S (Super)-$977
PNY(196E 1418) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5750 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.12
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
261% Outstanding
Lighting 381
Reflection 388
Parallax 411
310% 393 fps
MRender 468
Gravity 367
Splatting 248
283% 361 fps
Poor: 279%
This bench: 261%
Great: 314%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Wd_black SN850 PS5 1TB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 615000WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3197
Write 3,550
Mixed 2,717
705% 3,155 MB/s
4K Read 53.7
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 67.9
241% 86.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,090
DQ Write 829
DQ Mixed 923
700% 947 MB/s
Poor: 251% Great: 638%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$87
845GB free
Firmware: S0118C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 469 468 493 447 426 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 2,148
Write 1,453
Mixed 1,241
SusWrite 465
294% 1,327 MB/s
4K Read 51.7
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 69.3
232% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 950
DQ Write 787
DQ Mixed 509
479% 749 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 225%
Great: 372%
PNY SSD2SC120G1CS175 120GB
79GB free
Firmware: CS11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 192 189 184 188 188 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 299
Write 260
Mixed 217
SusWrite 187
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 6.2
20% 6.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 83%
Amd-raid Array 1 959GB
424GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 39 41 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 335%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
353GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 58 56 56 57 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 56.5
Write 60.5
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 56.3
40% 54.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 60%
Generic Mass-Storage 32GB
0GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 19.2
Write 12.7
Mixed 14.2
19% 15.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 4.9
332% 5.3 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3613 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 42.9
MC Write 39.3
MC Mixed 34.4
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 34.1
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 105%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 31: 0P 3R 5G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
31% 35% 26 215 59 170 27" 1280 720 AUS2707 VG27AQ1A
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,018 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback