Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 287%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 325%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics294% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateApr 26 '24 at 20:10
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 90.6
1-Core 150
2-Core 301
98% 181 Pts
4-Core 596
8-Core 1,160
104% 878 Pts
64-Core 2,253
139% 2,253 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 101%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-S (Super)-$977
PNY(196E 1418) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3315 MHz, MLim: 5950 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
294% Outstanding
Lighting 441
Reflection 450
Parallax 524
360% 472 fps
MRender 509
Gravity 410
Splatting 264
309% 395 fps
Poor: 279%
This bench: 294%
Great: 314%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Wd_black SN850 PS5 1TB
213GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 615000WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,368
Write 4,370
Mixed 3,198
887% 3,979 MB/s
4K Read 74
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 92.9
328% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,263
DQ Write 992
DQ Mixed 1,118
839% 1,125 MB/s
Poor: 251% Great: 638%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$87
874GB free
Firmware: S0118C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 548 555 555 542 525 541 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 2,514
Write 1,626
Mixed 1,380
SusWrite 544
336% 1,516 MB/s
4K Read 64.9
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 87.6
296% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 971
DQ Write 942
DQ Mixed 510
506% 808 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 268%
Great: 372%
PNY SSD2SC120G1CS175 120GB
76GB free
Firmware: CS11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 203 205 202 206 203 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 338
Write 276
Mixed 233
SusWrite 204
59% 263 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 7.1
23% 7.43 MB/s
DQ Read 88.7
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 95.3
83% 119 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 83%
Amd-raid Array 1 959GB
485GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 47 47 47 48 48 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 335%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
353GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 57 56 58 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 58.7
Write 48.7
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 56.6
39% 52.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 51.1
MC Write 44.7
MC Mixed 40.5
130% 45.4 GB/s
SC Read 28
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 36.7
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 66.1
61% 66.1 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 121%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 59 170 27" 2560 1440 AUS2707 VG27AQ1A
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,018 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback