Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	18.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201124
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 05 '21 at 09:10
Run Duration	227 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Memory 67.6 1-Core 147 2-Core 279 87% 164 Pts	4-Core 544 8-Core 886 87% 715 Pts	64-Core 1,380 85% 1,380 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E353) CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.12.1 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	55% Above average	Lighting 71.2 Reflection 61.9 Parallax 94.9 58% 76 fps	MRender 62.1 Gravity 74.5 Splatting 48.3 49% 61.6 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 959GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 164% 291GB free (System drive) Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 17 41 68 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	29.5% Poor	Read 69.5 Write 26.7 Mixed 36.6 SusWrite 30 30% 40.7 MB/s	4K Read 8.5 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 3.7 812% 4.9 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 335%
Seagate Expansion 4TB 22,017 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 614GB free Firmware: 0712 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 5367 Mixed 1.7 1,918% 2,684 MB/s	4K Read 587 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 24,450% 196 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 66%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 228GB free Firmware: 0710 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 25 34 21 27 31 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 3,435 Write 5 Mixed 8.4 SusWrite 25.4 621% 869 MB/s	4K Read 284 4K Mixed 1.7 18,021% 143 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 67%
TOSHIBA STOR.E ALU 2S 999GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 121GB free, PID 0b19 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.3 3.2 0.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,482 Write 4.7 SusWrite 0.8 766% 1,162 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2400 C17 2x16GB 666 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69% Good	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 17.8 MC Mixed 28.6 71% 24.8 GB/s	SC Read 20.6 SC Write 16.9 SC Mixed 27.1 62% 21.5 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,881 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $178

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,312x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	876x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	840x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	575x
RTX 3080Nvidia $879Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	519x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	407x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	343x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	277x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	266x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	143x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $60Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	142x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $1,011

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16