Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics315% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X670E-F GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory56.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '24 at 14:00
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$385
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 90.8
1-Core 197
2-Core 393
120% 227 Pts
4-Core 773
8-Core 1,508
135% 1,141 Pts
64-Core 1,715
106% 1,715 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 118%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-S (Super)-$960
Asus(1043 8966) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5750 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 551.31
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
315% Outstanding
Lighting 483
Reflection 463
Parallax 498
393% 481 fps
MRender 545
Gravity 405
Splatting 268
317% 406 fps
Poor: 283%
This bench: 315%
Great: 315%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 4TB-$285
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0B2QJXG7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,008
Write 4,239
Mixed 3,331
724% 3,193 MB/s
4K Read 66.2
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 87.2
284% 96.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,630
DQ Write 1,208
DQ Mixed 1,439
1,070% 1,426 MB/s
Poor: 306% Great: 619%
31GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 112
Write 55.5
Mixed 36.1
74% 68 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1
96% 2.93 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5 6400 C32 2x32GB-$220
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
174% Outstanding
MC Read 70.1
MC Write 56.5
MC Mixed 61.5
179% 62.7 GB/s
SC Read 56.8
SC Write 60.2
SC Mixed 55.2
164% 57.4 GB/s
Latency 54.7
73% 54.7 ns
Poor: 141%
This bench: 174%
Great: 229%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 27.2" 2560 1369 GSM7707 LG HDR 4K
Typical ROG STRIX X670E-F GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 413%
Desktop 117%
Workstation 420%

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X670E-F GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $2,411
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback