HP 750-467c

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 750-467c  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 828A
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime9.8 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '24 at 18:46
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 115
2-Core 225
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 610
62% 501 Pts
64-Core 610
38% 610 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
HP(103C 2B63) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 537.70
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 21.7
16% 19.7 fps
MRender 24.4
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 16
16% 20.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$48
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 337 320 307 312 313 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 442
Write 332
Mixed 276
SusWrite 313
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 31.3
110% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 235
200% 294 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 128%
ST500LM0 30-1RK17D 500GB
397GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 125 123 121 122 126 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.1% Average
Read 93.6
Write 117
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 122
140% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
61% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMUA5110MB78HAF-2400 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.6% Good
MC Read 27
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 20.1
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 21.1
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 75 23.8" 1280 720 ACR0719 CB242Y
Typical 750-467c Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP 750-467c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $310
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback