HP 750-467c

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 750-467c  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 828A
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime12.6 Days
Run DateNov 27 '23 at 18:15
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 112
2-Core 199
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 531
56% 448 Pts
64-Core 590
36% 590 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
HP(103C 2B63) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 18.7
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 18.9
15% 15.6 fps
MRender 19.1
Gravity 21.2
Splatting 15.8
15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$48
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 440
Write 365
Mixed 293
81% 366 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 30.1
108% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 239
202% 297 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 128%
PNY USB 3.2.1 FD 32GB
29GB free, PID 1006
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 119
Write 45
Mixed 5.7
53% 56.5 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
51% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 25%
KINGWIN EZD-2537U3 80GB
62GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 51.4
Write 32.1
Mixed 27.4
43% 37 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
62% 0.93 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMUA5110MB78HAF-2400 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.4% Good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 20.4
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 21.5
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 75 23.8" 1280 720 ACR0719 CB242Y
Typical 750-467c Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP 750-467c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $310
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback