Gigabyte B450M DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte B450M DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte B450M DS3H  (all builds)
Memory46 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190722
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '24 at 07:33
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 70
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 186
66% 118 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 619
60% 491 Pts
64-Core 1,012
63% 1,012 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 143
Parallax 132
107% 135 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 139
Splatting 120
102% 125 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$35
303GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 914 693 722 667 674 695 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1,899
Write 2,019
Mixed 1,554
SusWrite 728
348% 1,550 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 92.6
4K Mixed 54.8
181% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 745
DQ Write 418
DQ Mixed 618
450% 594 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 203%
Great: 284%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
173GB free
Firmware: M6CR041
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 395 377 99 161 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 486
Write 426
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 246
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 54.6
4K Mixed 1
68% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 1.1
65% 152 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 92%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
294GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 491
Write 459
Mixed 453
104% 468 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 47.2
158% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 368
277% 371 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
114GB free, PID null, Sandisk Ultra Dual Drive USB Type-C 128GB
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 141
Write 74.8
Mixed 52.4
99% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.1
119% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS16G4D26BFSE.16FD AITC-D416G32C16EXO-I BLS16G4D26BFSE.16FD AITC-D416G32C16EXO-I 64GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.2% Very good
MC Read 31
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 26.6
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 24.3
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 52 60 27.9" 1280 720 AUS28B1 ASUS VP28U
Typical GA-B450M DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 16,620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450M DS3H - $84

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $432
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback