Today's hottest deals

Asrock AB350M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock AB350M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '22 at 19:30
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 77%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$149
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 68.5
1-Core 67.2
2-Core 132
53% 89.4 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 497
46% 382 Pts
64-Core 635
39% 635 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.59
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
20.8% Poor
Lighting 26.7
Reflection 26.3
Parallax 24.9
22% 26 fps
MRender 24.3
Gravity 28.2
Splatting 18.5
19% 23.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba P300 1TB-$35
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 9.2
Write 85.5
Mixed 18.8
28% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.1
41% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 107%
TDK LoR TF10 16GB
7GB free, PID 0619
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 24.2
Write 4.5
Mixed 7
12% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
59% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD2 BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
74.6% Very good
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 26.3
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 17.2
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AB350M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,468 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock AB350M Pro4 - $85

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $451
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback