Supermicro PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSupermicro PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180523
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 24 '23 at 08:29
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 190
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 745
66% 561 Pts
64-Core 1882
116% 1882 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
Device(7377 2000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.1% Above average
Lighting 72.5
Reflection 72.9
Parallax 69.5
59% 71.6 fps
MRender 59.9
Gravity 69
Splatting 56.9
50% 61.9 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31256GTND 256GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 61.5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 424
Write 293
Mixed 330
77% 349 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 33.3
124% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 213
181% 263 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 90%
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLB256 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: EXH7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,099
Write 2021
Mixed 1,485
416% 1,869 MB/s
4K Read 50.5
4K Write 98.2
4K Mixed 63.1
209% 70.6 MB/s
DQ Read 517
DQ Write 459
DQ Mixed 477
361% 484 MB/s
Poor: 123% Great: 262%
Hs-ssd-e100 128G 128GB
79GB free
Firmware: 72
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 242
Write 220
Mixed 224
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 30.5
111% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 174
128% 166 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
81GB free
Firmware: 1H18
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 58.7
Write 56.3
Mixed 42.4
39% 52.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18JSF1G72PZ-1G9E1 36JSF1G72PZ-1G9K1 36JSF1G72PZ-1G9K1 18JSF1G72PZ-1G9E1 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.4% Above average
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 17.3
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.3
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 21.7" 1600 837 GSM5ABB LG FULL HD
Typical PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

System: Supermicro PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $583
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback