Supermicro PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180523
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 23 '22 at 16:00
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 93
2-Core 186
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 702
64% 535 Pts
64-Core 1,868
116% 1,868 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170
HP(103C 1098) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.91
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Lighting 13.2
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 10.9
11% 13.2 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 13.2
Splatting 14.3
11% 12.8 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31256GTND 256GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 117 93 46 83 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 422
Write 352
Mixed 158
SusWrite 98.9
57% 258 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 24.5
4K Mixed 17.4
36% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 55.1
DQ Write 99.7
DQ Mixed 209
122% 121 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 90%
Hs-ssd-e100 128G 128GB
91GB free
Firmware: SN7872
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 230 223 223 226 225 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51% Above average
Read 236
Write 92.1
Mixed 116
SusWrite 226
37% 168 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 17.4
72% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 174
120% 147 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51%
Great: 100%
Initio 3639S 500GB
283GB free
Firmware: 0057
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
25.5% Poor
Read 51.1
Write 36
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 37.4
29% 39.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 65%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
141GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 83 81 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 88.4
Write 91
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 81
59% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18JSF1G72PZ-1G9E1 36JSF1G72PZ-1G9K1 36JSF1G72PZ-1G9K1 18JSF1G72PZ-1G9E1 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72% Very good
MC Read 50.8
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 17.5
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.7
28% 9.67 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

System: Supermicro PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $583
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback