Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Intel DG31GL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	INTEL DG31GL
Motherboard	Intel DG31GL (all builds)
Memory	0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080318
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 25 '22 at 16:41
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$57 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% J3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	44.1% Average	Memory 74.1 1-Core 46.9 2-Core 91.3 46% 70.8 Pts	4-Core 82.9 8-Core 94.3 12% 88.6 Pts	64-Core 95.3 6% 95.3 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 120GB free (System drive) Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 123 123 123 121 123 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Read 119 Write 114 Mixed 70.6 SusWrite 122 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 69%
hp x304m 64GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 58GB free, PID fc40 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 12 14 14 14 18 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 35.2 Write 14 Mixed 15.4 SusWrite 13.4 23% 19.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 2.2 134% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 24%
Seagate Expansion HDD 1TB 601GB free, PID 2030 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 22 22 22 22 20 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.8% Very poor	Read 28 Write 29.2 Mixed 26.5 SusWrite 21.9 36% 26.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.3 55% 0.87 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 4.6 MC Mixed 3.7 12% 4.37 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 4.3 13% 4.47 GB/s	Latency 92.2 43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback