Supermicro PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSupermicro PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180523
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '23 at 03:39
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 191
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 729
66% 553 Pts
64-Core 1,897
117% 1,897 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
Device(7377 2000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59% Above average
Lighting 76.1
Reflection 76.2
Parallax 72.9
62% 75.1 fps
MRender 62.7
Gravity 74
Splatting 59.9
53% 65.5 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31256GTND 256GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 146 116 82 110 43 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 417
Write 132
Mixed 334
SusWrite 95.9
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 34.3
130% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 206
177% 258 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 90%
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLB256 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: EXH7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1291 393 409 408 409 409 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 2121
Write 2,104
Mixed 1,440
SusWrite 553
347% 1,554 MB/s
4K Read 51.4
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 67.1
219% 74.3 MB/s
DQ Read 554
DQ Write 493
DQ Mixed 516
389% 521 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 210%
Great: 262%
Hs-ssd-e100 128G 128GB
79GB free
Firmware: 72
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 212 225 223 226 221 MB/s
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66.4% Good
Read 250
Write 231
Mixed 230
SusWrite 216
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 31.7
117% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 176
129% 167 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
81GB free
Firmware: 1H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 79 78 79 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 57.6
Write 55.9
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 78.5
43% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18JSF1G72PZ-1G9E1 36JSF1G72PZ-1G9K1 36JSF1G72PZ-1G9K1 18JSF1G72PZ-1G9E1 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.9% Above average
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 17.6
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.7
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5ABB LG FULL HD
Typical PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

System: Supermicro PIO-617R-TLN4F+-ST031

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $583
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback