Intel X99

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	262% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Intel X99 (all builds)
Memory	41.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20210130
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 10 '22 at 19:15
Run Duration	293 Seconds
Run User	BLR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 592 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Memory 88.8 1-Core 76.7 2-Core 164 66% 110 Pts	4-Core 327 8-Core 693 60% 510 Pts	64-Core 1,337 83% 1,337 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170 16,214 User benchmarks, average bench 11% HP(103C 1098) 2GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.84 Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Lighting 13.6 Reflection 16.2 Parallax 11.2 11% 13.7 fps	MRender 11.2 Gravity 13.8 Splatting 14.8 11% 13.3 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLB256 256GB 3,384 User benchmarks, average bench 200% 186GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3L1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 605 412 412 410 410 405 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	262% Outstanding	Read 2244 Write 2,083 Mixed 1,390 SusWrite 442 343% 1,540 MB/s	4K Read 65.3 4K Write 207 4K Mixed 81.8 313% 118 MB/s	DQ Read 1,000 DQ Write 1,222 DQ Mixed 1155 859% 1,126 MB/s
Poor: 123% ↑ This bench: 262% Great: 262%
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155 13,464 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 17GB free Firmware: 5.20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 71 68 59 65 69 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	63.4% Good	Read 374 Write 181 Mixed 253 SusWrite 70.1 49% 219 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 53 4K Mixed 33.8 112% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 160 132% 189 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 83%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200 31,545 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 230GB free Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 403 398 399 399 394 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Read 406 Write 438 Mixed 310 SusWrite 403 88% 389 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 60.9 4K Mixed 32.2 109% 38.9 MB/s	DQ Read 148 DQ Write 286 DQ Mixed 174 144% 203 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 107%
OCZ Vertex 450 128GB-$80 1,040 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 65GB free Firmware: 3.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 278 276 259 273 226 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	Read 419 Write 281 Mixed 275 SusWrite 265 69% 310 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 53 4K Mixed 25.1 88% 32.2 MB/s	DQ Read 283 DQ Write 277 DQ Mixed 252 197% 270 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 90%
Seagate ST31500541AS 1.5TB 9,968 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 102 102 101 102 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Read 100 Write 100 Mixed 55 SusWrite 102 65% 89.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 51GB free Firmware: CC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 107 105 107 108 105 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Read 103 Write 83.5 Mixed 77.5 SusWrite 105 68% 92.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 128% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 112%
StoreJet Transcend 500GB 1,300 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 54GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 41 42 41 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Read 9.3 Write 41.8 Mixed 10.5 SusWrite 41.4 39% 25.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 20%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB 14,782 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 11GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 12 13 13 12 13 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	20.6% Poor	Read 91.5 Write 16 Mixed 21 SusWrite 12.9 35% 35.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1.8 117% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36KSF2G72PZ-1G6E1 4x16GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	MC Read 51.2 MC Write 42.8 MC Mixed 37.1 125% 43.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 18.5 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 68.7 58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99 Builds (Compare 2,268 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X99

CPU
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples	221x
Xeon E5-2678 v3IntelBench 71%, 6,301 samples	176x
Xeon E5-2670 v3IntelBench 66%, 3,953 samples	110x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	138x
RTX 3060Nvidia $274Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	116x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	97x

SSD
SNV2S1000G 1TBKingstonBench 260%, 75,739 samples	45x
NE-256 256GBBench 159%, 6,044 samples	45x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	37x

RAM
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	229x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	133x
Atermiter 2x16GBUnknownBench 65%, 839 samples	88x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $130

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16