Asus PRIME Z270-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270-P  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '23 at 13:03
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$67
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 198
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 267
35% 264 Pts
64-Core 252
16% 252 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
XFX(1682 956D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Lighting 27.3
Reflection 27.1
Parallax 38.3
22% 30.9 fps
MRender 25.7
Gravity 30.8
Splatting 24.7
22% 27.1 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qnap QDA-A2MAR RAID0 1TB
903GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H220916a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 308 296 317 274 331 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 505
Write 18.4
Mixed 269
SusWrite 303
60% 274 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 8.6
4K Mixed 9.7
27% 8.37 MB/s
DQ Read 8.5
DQ Write 20.6
DQ Mixed 21.2
14% 16.8 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 76%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$87
275GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1279 1328 1173 912 853 954 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,543
Write 1,363
Mixed 1,457
SusWrite 1,083
306% 1,362 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 61.5
4K Mixed 44.2
143% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 222
169% 231 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 183%
Great: 442%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
47GB free
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 81 84 83 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 123
Write 101
Mixed 112
SusWrite 82.4
24% 105 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 20.8
76% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 91.8
74% 105 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 73%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
406GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1543 1064 616 602 606 617 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 1452
Write 1,088
Mixed 1,175
SusWrite 841
255% 1,139 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 41.6
130% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 236
181% 248 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 162%
Great: 340%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GB-$90
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.5% Very good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 27.6
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 31.1
SC Mixed 19.5
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 27.9" 1280 720 AOC2879 U2879G6
Typical PRIME Z270-P Builds (Compare 6,451 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-P - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $655
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback