Performance Results

Gaming 20%
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 19%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '22 at 14:26
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$95
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 84.4
1-Core 124
2-Core 238
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 717
71% 580 Pts
64-Core 945
58% 945 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
AMD(1002 0B04) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver:
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Lighting 18.5
Reflection 27.2
Parallax 28.8
15% 24.8 fps
MRender 25
Gravity 22.5
Splatting 24.5
20% 24 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 480GB
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM6B.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 128 97 196 109 47 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 470
Write 252
Mixed 333
SusWrite 127
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 94.5
4K Mixed 36.7
155% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 188
164% 241 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GEIL CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
70.6% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 19.7
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 21.2
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,250 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 127%
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 114%

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $669
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback