Gigabyte B450 AORUS M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte B450 AORUS M (all builds)
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180808
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 30 '22 at 15:48
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	72%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$115 83,528 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	46.8% Average	Memory 58.7 1-Core 89.3 2-Core 135 55% 94.4 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 198 27% 201 Pts	64-Core 201 12% 201 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$146 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29% Poor	Lighting 36.4 Reflection 39.9 Parallax 37.8 30% 38 fps	MRender 38.6 Gravity 38.7 Splatting 26.8 28% 34.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB (2018)-$59 8,648 User benchmarks, average bench 193% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: 101140WD Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete		Read 747 Write 1,032 Mixed 845 197% 875 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 36.6 4K Mixed 22.9 73% 25.1 MB/s	DQ Read 474 DQ Write 264 DQ Mixed 327 254% 355 MB/s
Poor: 141% Great: 228%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$65 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 802GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 108 112 108 110 114 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	59.1% Above average	Read 98.7 Write 81.6 Mixed 63.1 SusWrite 107 64% 87.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GB-$90 9,857 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	68.6% Good	MC Read 25.4 MC Write 25.7 MC Mixed 24.7 72% 25.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 21.4 56% 19.8 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 45: 6R 3G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
45%	27%	56	296	222	60	23.1"	1920 1080	GSM5790 E2350

History: Score 48: 4R 6G 10B | Score 45: 6R 3G 6B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B450 AORUS M Builds (Compare 6,794 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 49%

Yacht

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 46%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS M - $85

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $89Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	1,251x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $165Bench 73%, 446,215 samples	1,154x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $140Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	485x

GPU
RX 580AMD $179Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	438x
RTX 2060Nvidia $225Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	363x
RTX 3060Nvidia $290Bench 100%, 301,333 samples	338x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $21Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	175x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	154x
A400 480GBKingston $26Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	142x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	352x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	236x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $41Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	230x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $414

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $315	Nvidia RTX 3060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12600K $187	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $300	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $86
Intel Core i5-12400F $150	Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $800	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $67	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16