MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 269%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 255%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics254% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '23 at 09:18
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$310
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 100
1-Core 167
2-Core 329
108% 199 Pts
4-Core 634
8-Core 1,013
101% 824 Pts
64-Core 1,455
90% 1,455 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 109%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000
Sapphire(1DA2 E471) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
254% Outstanding
Lighting 308
Reflection 421
Parallax 814
251% 514 fps
MRender 545
Gravity 300
Splatting 503
371% 449 fps
Poor: 221%
This bench: 254%
Great: 294%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX950 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A0S63C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1396 1248 1335 1635 1634 1694 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 2,396
Write 1,825
Mixed 169
SusWrite 1,490
326% 1,470 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 52.1
172% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,145
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 372
350% 573 MB/s
Poor: 202%
This bench: 270%
Great: 407%
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$74
72GB free
Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 510 516 516 516 512 457 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 1,908
Write 517
Mixed 610
SusWrite 505
193% 885 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 34.6
111% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 607
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 350
271% 383 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 160%
Great: 308%
Adata SU635 240GB-$20
136GB free
Firmware: V8X01c89
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 370 361 369 373 369 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 430
Write 356
Mixed 341
SusWrite 369
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 34.1
4K Mixed 23.8
80% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 190
132% 162 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 97%
Team T253X7004T 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: VE0R840G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 385 376 384 389 387 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 328
Write 368
Mixed 321
SusWrite 385
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 29.8
4K Mixed 23.7
82% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 180
121% 146 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 117%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 2TB
748GB free, PID 0906
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 109 110 109 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 144
Write 136
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 109
131% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
37% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 54
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 42.4
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 33.3
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 40.8
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 44.9
89% 44.9 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 113%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 23.8" 1280 720 AOC2402 24G2W1G4
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,645 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $128

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $907
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback