MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics200% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231019
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 20 '23 at 07:04
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$310
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 96
1-Core 120
2-Core 240
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 855
80% 665 Pts
64-Core 1,439
89% 1,439 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000
Sapphire(1DA2 E471) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
200% Outstanding
Lighting 194
Reflection 273
Parallax 796
158% 421 fps
MRender 520
Gravity 297
Splatting 476
355% 431 fps
Poor: 221%
This bench: 200%
Great: 294%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX950 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A0S63C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1346 1396 1481 1663 1700 1659 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 2,349
Write 1,765
Mixed 195
SusWrite 1,541
325% 1,463 MB/s
4K Read 48.5
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 50
166% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,077
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 323
313% 522 MB/s
Poor: 202%
This bench: 267%
Great: 407%
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$74
72GB free
Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 969 956 419 1098 1127 538 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1,918
Write 541
Mixed 1,106
SusWrite 851
244% 1,104 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 49.2
163% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,138
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 292
303% 526 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 208%
Great: 308%
Adata SU635 240GB-$20
136GB free
Firmware: V8X01c89
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 363 362 361 360 362 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 431
Write 359
Mixed 344
SusWrite 362
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 30.2
4K Mixed 23
76% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 192
130% 159 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 97%
Team T253X7004T 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: VE0R840G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 376 376 375 375 375 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
68% Good
Read 374
Write 368
Mixed 342
SusWrite 375
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 28
4K Mixed 24.6
80% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 187
121% 141 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 68%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 54.6
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 42.3
115% 40.3 GB/s
SC Read 31.5
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 39
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 52.8
76% 52.8 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 112%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 144 23.8" 1280 720 AOC2402 24G2W1G4
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,646 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $128

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $907
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback