MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 183%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics202% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231019
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 20 '23 at 06:29
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$310
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Memory 96.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 239
87% 152 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 838
79% 655 Pts
64-Core 1,459
90% 1,459 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000
Sapphire(1DA2 E471) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
202% Outstanding
Lighting 196
Reflection 274
Parallax 844
159% 438 fps
MRender 542
Gravity 297
Splatting 469
358% 436 fps
Poor: 221%
This bench: 202%
Great: 294%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX950 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A0S63C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 828 1058 1163 1448 1479 1532 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 2,288
Write 1701
Mixed 135
SusWrite 1,251
298% 1,344 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 42.1
147% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,086
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 299
303% 518 MB/s
Poor: 202%
This bench: 241%
Great: 407%
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$74
72GB free
Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 507 484 504 507 512 505 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 1,796
Write 513
Mixed 622
SusWrite 503
188% 858 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 31.9
112% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 611
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 286
234% 348 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 154%
Great: 308%
Adata SU635 240GB-$20
136GB free
Firmware: V8X01c89
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 361 362 364 368 365 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 429
Write 353
Mixed 344
SusWrite 363
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 25.7
83% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 191
130% 158 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 97%
Team T253X7004T 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: VE0R840G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 374 376 379 384 386 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 381
Write 375
Mixed 341
SusWrite 379
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 27.2
89% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 186
120% 137 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 54.1
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 42.8
115% 40.3 GB/s
SC Read 31.3
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 39.8
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 50
80% 50 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 112%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 144 23.8" 1280 720 AOC2402 24G2W1G4
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,644 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $909
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback