MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 262%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 248%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics245% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '23 at 10:01
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$310
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 99
1-Core 165
2-Core 329
108% 198 Pts
4-Core 654
8-Core 1,021
103% 838 Pts
64-Core 1,461
90% 1,461 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 110%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000
Sapphire(1DA2 E471) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
245% Outstanding
Lighting 295
Reflection 412
Parallax 836
240% 514 fps
MRender 545
Gravity 290
Splatting 477
360% 437 fps
Poor: 221%
This bench: 245%
Great: 294%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX950 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A0S63C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1279 1461 1262 1613 1568 1069 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 2,381
Write 1,795
Mixed 162
SusWrite 1,375
317% 1,428 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 51.4
170% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,095
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 372
343% 555 MB/s
Poor: 202%
This bench: 261%
Great: 407%
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$74
47GB free
Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 505 488 499 503 497 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 1,826
Write 492
Mixed 592
SusWrite 497
186% 852 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 32.7
109% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 606
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 340
262% 371 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 154%
Great: 308%
Adata SU635 240GB-$20
136GB free
Firmware: V8X01c89
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 372 370 369 369 369 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
71% Very good
Read 428
Write 360
Mixed 350
SusWrite 369
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 32.7
4K Mixed 23.8
79% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 189
131% 163 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 71%
Great: 97%
Team T253X7004T 4TB
4TB free
Firmware: VE0R840G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 388 386 385 386 386 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 378
Write 375
Mixed 332
SusWrite 385
83% 368 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 24.6
82% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 191
132% 162 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 54
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 42.6
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 32.4
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 41.7
93% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 42.7
94% 42.7 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 113%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 38: 0P 4R 4G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
38% 24% 58 215 60 144 23.8" 1920 1057 AOC2402 24G2W1G4
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,645 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $128

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $907
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback