MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 215%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 204%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics204% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive259% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '23 at 07:33
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$328
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 96.1
1-Core 118
2-Core 322
95% 179 Pts
4-Core 641
8-Core 976
100% 808 Pts
64-Core 1,456
90% 1,456 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 108%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000
Sapphire(1DA2 E471) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
204% Outstanding
Lighting 194
Reflection 274
Parallax 799
158% 422 fps
MRender 544
Gravity 298
Splatting 499
369% 447 fps
Poor: 216%
This bench: 204%
Great: 293%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX950 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A0S63C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1416 1345 1443 1514 1516 1513 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 2394
Write 1,624
Mixed 142
SusWrite 1,458
311% 1,404 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 37.1
4K Mixed 42.7
150% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,097
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 311
309% 524 MB/s
Poor: 202%
This bench: 259%
Great: 407%
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$80
72GB free
Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 509 513 514 507 512 488 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 1,830
Write 488
Mixed 619
SusWrite 507
188% 861 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 32.5
4K Mixed 30.6
99% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 603
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 249
214% 328 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 151%
Great: 308%
Adata SU635 240GB-$20
136GB free
Firmware: V8X01c89
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 344 353 358 360 356 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 429
Write 353
Mixed 345
SusWrite 352
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 31.2
4K Mixed 23.1
78% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 191
125% 148 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 97%
Team T253X7004T 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: VE0R840G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 377 378 379 378 378 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 330
Write 379
Mixed 343
SusWrite 377
81% 357 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 28.3
4K Mixed 24
81% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 189
121% 139 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 52.8
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 42
113% 39.6 GB/s
SC Read 33.7
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 41.1
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 48.4
83% 48.4 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 111%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 144 23.8" 1280 720 AOC2402 24G2W1G4
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,584 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $902
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback