HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.53% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive93.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1200x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '23 at 11:55
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$52
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 201
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 360
49% 363 Pts
64-Core 363
22% 363 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Asus(1043 03EA) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.53% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 7.2
7% 8.2 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 7.2
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.53%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 400 413 435 435 437 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 402
Write 222
Mixed 370
SusWrite 420
80% 354 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 35.9
125% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 194
173% 257 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 100%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
67GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 160 171 166 170 171 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 358
Write 204
Mixed 255
SusWrite 166
55% 246 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 68.4
4K Mixed 38.9
132% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 209
159% 216 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 87%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
366GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 271 299 325 348 308 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 93.9
Write 96.6
Mixed 82.6
SusWrite 317
34% 147 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 18.2
4K Mixed 8.3
32% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 10
DQ Write 15.8
DQ Mixed 11.6
9% 12.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 102%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB
421GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 128 127 127 127 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 118
Write 128
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 127
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
58.4% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 17.3
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 19.4
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 58 60 25.6" 1280 720 HWP286A HP ZR24w
Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback