HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.53% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive93.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1200x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '23 at 10:25
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$52
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 101
2-Core 199
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 356
47% 353 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 71%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Asus(1043 03EA) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.53% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 7.2
7% 8.2 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 7.2
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.53%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 412 417 427 438 437 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 404
Write 407
Mixed 356
SusWrite 419
90% 397 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 35.8
125% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 192
172% 256 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 100%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
67GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 159 169 159 158 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 333
Write 192
Mixed 249
SusWrite 157
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 40.5
136% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 202
155% 211 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75%
Great: 87%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
366GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 256 270 360 275 302 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 223
Write 122
Mixed 121
SusWrite 301
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 23.1
4K Mixed 9.5
38% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 13.3
DQ Write 21.5
DQ Mixed 16.4
13% 17.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 102%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB
421GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 127 128 127 127 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 118
Write 124
Mixed 57
SusWrite 127
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
57.9% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 17.6
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 18.4
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback