HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.54% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive91.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1200x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '23 at 20:12
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$52
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 202
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 349
36% 292 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Asus(1043 03EA) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.54% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 7.2
7% 8.2 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 7.3
6% 7.5 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.54%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 417 414 431 436 434 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 390
Write 342
Mixed 372
SusWrite 420
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 34
121% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 190
171% 256 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 100%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
67GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 148 165 172 159 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 344
Write 189
Mixed 256
SusWrite 161
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 70.2
4K Mixed 40.6
136% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 189
148% 204 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 87%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
366GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 266 257 285 284 278 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 56.6
Write 279
Mixed 126
SusWrite 286
43% 187 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 24.5
80% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 185
149% 205 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 102%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB
421GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 127 128 128 127 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 116
Write 124
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 127
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
57.9% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 17.5
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 16.7
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback