HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive87.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1200x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 25 '23 at 21:42
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$52
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 101
2-Core 198
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 349
46% 345 Pts
64-Core 349
22% 349 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Asus(1043 03EA) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.58% Terrible
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 7.2
7% 8.23 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 7.2
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.58%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 405 410 437 428 438 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 336
Write 238
Mixed 317
SusWrite 405
73% 324 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 35.2
117% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 192
171% 254 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 100%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
67GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 153 167 158 167 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 354
Write 188
Mixed 241
SusWrite 160
52% 236 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 66.9
4K Mixed 39.8
135% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 206
158% 215 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 87%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
366GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 265 270 276 278 286 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 401
Write 350
Mixed 327
SusWrite 286
77% 341 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 31.5
116% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 192
173% 259 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 102%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB
421GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 127 127 127 128 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 123
Write 123
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 127
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
57.5% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 17.4
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 17.6
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback