Zoostorm 7200-5327A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemZoostorm 7200-5327A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK H110M-R
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190703
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateSep 24 '23 at 22:34
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$93
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 84.9
1-Core 91.6
2-Core 187
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 311
40% 300 Pts
64-Core 311
19% 311 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.7% Above average
Lighting 62.9
Reflection 71.3
Parallax 64.3
51% 66.2 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 62.9
Splatting 55.7
50% 61.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S101 1TB
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN14130
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 386 392 416 407 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 405
Write 432
Mixed 394
SusWrite 373
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 55.5
4K Mixed 32.7
113% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 278
202% 258 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 85%
Great: 107%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
62GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 123 123 122 123 123 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 441
Write 324
Mixed 345
SusWrite 147
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 67.3
4K Mixed 40.3
138% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 173
179% 294 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
288GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 137 138 137 136 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 170
Write 103
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 137
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 88%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GEIL CL16-16-16 D4-2400 Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
68.3% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 22.2
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 18.5
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 34: 0P 4R 4G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
34% 23% 43 214 59 60 24" 1280 720 BNQ78A7 BenQ GL2450H
Typical 7200-5327A Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Zoostorm 7200-5327A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $237
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback