Zoostorm 7200-5327A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

22 months ago, 16 months ago.

System	Zoostorm 7200-5327A (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK H110M-R
Memory	6.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190703
Uptime	5.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 29 '22 at 16:21
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$94 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	Memory 77.6 1-Core 91.8 2-Core 175 66% 115 Pts	4-Core 146 8-Core 279 25% 213 Pts	64-Core 225 14% 225 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.4% Above average	Lighting 63.6 Reflection 72.5 Parallax 65.5 52% 67.2 fps	MRender 66.8 Gravity 64.7 Splatting 55.9 50% 62.5 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: CB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 405 Write 382 Mixed 300 81% 362 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 73.4 4K Mixed 38.6 136% 47.8 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 317 DQ Mixed 174 177% 288 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 112GB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 107 106 107 108 109 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Read 162 Write 150 Mixed 82.2 SusWrite 108 92% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
GEIL CL16-16-16 D4-2400 Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	MC Read 19.4 MC Write 23.4 MC Mixed 21.6 61% 21.5 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 10.5 22% 7.53 GB/s	Latency 85.1 47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 7200-5327A Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

System: Zoostorm 7200-5327A

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $94Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	13x
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	8x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	5x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	1x

SSD
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	2x
PLUS 480GBSandiskBench 48%, 58,990 samples	2x
MX500 1TBCrucial $74Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	1x

RAM
CL16-16-16 D4-2400 Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 16GBGEILBench 66%, 5 samples	5x
CT8G4DFD8213.C16FHP Corsair CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 16GBCrucialBench 67%, 21 samples	3x
CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBR2 1x8GBCrucialBench 39%, 2,739 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $238

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16