Dell Precision T1650

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics84.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Precision T1650
MotherboardDell Precision T1650  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180222
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateAug 30 '23 at 18:29
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1270 V2
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 90.7
2-Core 178
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 461
48% 388 Pts
64-Core 460
28% 460 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$250
Asus(1043 8810) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.1% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 140
Parallax 98.9
84% 114 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 96.8
Splatting 84.5
85% 107 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM841 2.5" 7mm 256GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 402 398 424 440 426 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 435
Write 395
Mixed 317
SusWrite 416
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 47.5
4K Mixed 27.9
96% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 287
223% 305 MB/s
Samsung SM841 2.5" 7mm 256GB
235GB free
Firmware: DXM01D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 230 226 242 247 247 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.1% Poor
Read 229
Write 220
Mixed 208
SusWrite 237
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 3.4
11% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 107%
WD easystore 2647 5TB
1.5TB free, PID 2647
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 83 84 83 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 70.7
Write 77.7
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 83.4
100% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.8
133% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.5% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.2
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 14.1
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 165 27" 1280 720 SPT0AB9 Sceptre Y27
Typical Precision T1650 Builds (Compare 961 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T1650

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback