Dell Precision T1650

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics95.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Precision T1650
MotherboardDell Precision T1650  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180222
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 27 '23 at 03:53
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1270 V2
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 96.8
2-Core 167
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 466
47% 384 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Asus(1043 8810) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2325 MHz, MLim: 4275 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.2% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 156
Parallax 113
95% 128 fps
MRender 155
Gravity 110
Splatting 95.1
95% 120 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM841 2.5" 7mm 256GB
607GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 425 429 466 467 464 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 402
Write 401
Mixed 317
SusWrite 447
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 27.4
94% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 291
238% 339 MB/s
Samsung SM841 2.5" 7mm 256GB
237GB free
Firmware: DXM01D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 232 234 250 251 250 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.7% Poor
Read 167
Write 215
Mixed 168
SusWrite 242
45% 198 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 3.1
10% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 107%
WD easystore 2647 5TB
1.5TB free, PID 2647
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 87 88 88 87 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 70.2
Write 88.2
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 87.7
107% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.7
197% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
54.1% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 16.5
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 17.6
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T1650 Builds (Compare 957 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T1650

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback