| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 93% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 11 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Dell Precision T1650 |
| Motherboard | Dell Precision T1650 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180222 |
| Uptime | 0.7 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 27 '23 at 20:38 |
| Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 36% |
PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1270 V2
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
66.3%
Good
|
60% 98.5 Pts
|
39% 305 Pts
|
22% 361 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Asus(1043 8810) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2325 MHz, MLim: 4275 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
93%
Outstanding
|
93% 126 fps
|
92% 117 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
44.8%
Average
|
44% 15.4 GB/s
|
36% 12.6 GB/s
|
54% 74.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Precision T1650 Builds (Compare 957 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Dell Precision T1650
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 309x |
| Xeon E3-1240 V2Intel $345Bench 71%, 4,997 samples | 148x |
| Xeon E3-1270 V2IntelBench 73%, 3,610 samples | 101x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 84x |
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 74x |
| Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples | 63x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $384 |