Dell Precision T1650

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics94.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Precision T1650
MotherboardDell Precision T1650  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '23 at 02:25
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1270 V2
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 84.9
1-Core 95.1
2-Core 174
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 470
48% 387 Pts
64-Core 453
28% 453 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Asus(1043 8810) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2325 MHz, MLim: 4275 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.5% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 154
Parallax 121
94% 130 fps
MRender 157
Gravity 108
Splatting 95.1
95% 120 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM841 2.5" 7mm 256GB
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 384 399 435 425 436 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 408
Write 373
Mixed 306
SusWrite 411
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 28.3
97% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 289
224% 306 MB/s
Samsung SM841 2.5" 7mm 256GB
237GB free
Firmware: DXM01D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 399 407 446 448 447 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 299
Write 374
Mixed 242
SusWrite 424
76% 335 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 17.9
62% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 125
140% 236 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 107%
WD easystore 2647 5TB
1.5TB free, PID 2647
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 90 90 91 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 71.5
Write 87.9
Mixed 62
SusWrite 90.6
108% 78 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.7
217% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
54% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.7
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 17
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T1650 Builds (Compare 957 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T1650

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback