Dell Precision T1650

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 13 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 11 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Dell Precision T1650
Motherboard	Dell Precision T1650 (all builds)
Memory	9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180222
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Mar 22 '23 at 22:01
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1270 V2 3,610 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 95.6 2-Core 175 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 313 8-Core 474 49% 393 Pts	64-Core 472 29% 472 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM841 2.5" 7mm 256GB 364GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 434 445 445 441 448 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 423 Write 357 Mixed 290 SusWrite 439 85% 377 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 45.4 4K Mixed 28.8 92% 31.5 MB/s	DQ Read 345 DQ Write 298 DQ Mixed 292 227% 312 MB/s

Samsung SM841 2.5" 7mm 256GB 2,869 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 237GB free Firmware: DXM01D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 246 246 245 246 247 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.8% Poor	Read 173 Write 213 Mixed 172 SusWrite 245 46% 201 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 2.9 10% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 107%
WD easystore 2647 5TB 3,858 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1.5TB free, PID 2647 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 89 90 89 88 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	44.2% Average	Read 72 Write 82.1 Mixed 54.1 SusWrite 89.4 103% 74.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0.7 183% 2 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 4x4GB 3,905 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	54% Above average	MC Read 19.9 MC Write 19.4 MC Mixed 16.3 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 17.5 SC Mixed 17.3 49% 17 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision T1650 Builds (Compare 953 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T1650

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	309x
Xeon E3-1240 V2Intel $345Bench 71%, 4,997 samples	148x
Xeon E3-1270 V2IntelBench 73%, 3,610 samples	101x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	81x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	74x
Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples	63x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	31x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	21x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	20x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples	52x
M378B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 2,354 samples	21x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $384

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $288	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16