Biostar A960D+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics3.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar A960D+  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 16 '23 at 07:37
Run Duration452 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Sempron 145-$50
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Memory 35.8
1-Core 7.4
2-Core 8.7
15% 17.3 Pts
4-Core 8.8
8-Core 6.6
1% 7.7 Pts
64-Core 3
0% 3 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 531.79
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.32% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 19.1
0% 11.6 fps
MRender 0.1
Gravity 20
Splatting 13
10% 11 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 3.32%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
401GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKT1A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 160 136 56 37 35 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.6% Poor
Read 19
Write 28.3
Mixed 64.4
SusWrite 93.5
12% 51.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 14.7
4K Mixed 18.1
36% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 27.1
DQ Write 49.4
DQ Mixed 30.8
26% 35.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
460GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 117 105 40 32 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
28% Poor
Read 25.8
Write 29.6
Mixed 28
SusWrite 71.6
28% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
65% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-007.A00LF Hynix MPPU4GB13338Chips 8GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
2.78% Terrible
MC Read 0.3
MC Write 0.5
MC Mixed 0.3
1% 0.37 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 1.3
SC Mixed 1
4% 1.27 GB/s
Latency 223
18% 223 ns
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.78%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 14 4 60 23.8" 1280 720 MSI3BA9 MSI MP241X
Typical A960D+ Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A960D+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $206
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback