Samsung RC530/RC730

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Samsung RC530/RC730 (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG RC530/RC730
Memory	3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110927
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 31 '23 at 08:28
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	46%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	Memory 45.6 1-Core 30.8 2-Core 50.6 28% 42.3 Pts	4-Core 160 8-Core 140 20% 150 Pts	64-Core 246 15% 246 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sanyo(144D C0C1) 2GB Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.62% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 1.5 2% 1.7 fps	MRender 2.6 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 2.3 2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.62% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$60 16,938 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 124GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 25 24 27 21 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	21.5% Poor	Read 51.1 Write 28.6 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 24.1 23% 31.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 34% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 71%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB 39,476 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 380GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 79 79 76 81 81 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	37% Below average	Read 49.2 Write 63.1 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 78.6 44% 60.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.4 149% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 Kingston 99U5428-040.A01G 8GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	MC Read 12.1 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 11.4 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 6.6 18% 6.33 GB/s	Latency 178 22% 178 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	27	20	60	21.5"	1920 1080	IVM5636 PLT2252

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical RC530/RC730 Builds (Compare 204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung RC530/RC730

CPU
Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples	101x
Core i7-2630QMIntel $199Bench 55%, 39,605 samples	50x
Core i5-2430MIntel $53Bench 50%, 41,461 samples	28x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	138x
GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples	56x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	10x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	9x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	31x
M471B5773DH0-CH9 M471B5273DH0-CH9 6GBSamsungBench 36%, 2,424 samples	21x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $253

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16