Today's hottest deals

Asus Z97-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z97-C  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJul 23 '22 at 19:02
Run Duration924 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$86
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 89.9
1-Core 112
2-Core 217
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 556
56% 458 Pts
64-Core 566
35% 566 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$94
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.2% Above average
Lighting 66
Reflection 63.3
Parallax 92.9
54% 74.1 fps
MRender 64.5
Gravity 74.4
Splatting 46.7
49% 61.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 416 211 69 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 464
Mixed 390
SusWrite 128
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 94.8
4K Mixed 56.6
188% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 350
264% 355 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 102%
Great: 134%
OCZ Vertex 3 480GB
227GB free
Firmware: UG4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 2.3 348 70 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 436
Write 328
Mixed 252
SusWrite 70.1
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 37
4K Mixed 15.7
56% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 96.2
DQ Mixed 42.6
49% 85.1 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 68%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$47
236GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.1 435 412 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 494
Write 414
Mixed 416
SusWrite 141
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 84.9
4K Mixed 41.1
149% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 141
115% 167 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 2.5 196 203 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
61% Good
Read 146
Write 164
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 67
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
110% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61%
Great: 106%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$60
26GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.3 77 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 72.5
Write 73.6
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 26.2
43% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 71%
USB 3.0 LucidPort USB300 2TB
60GB free, PID 5100
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.6 128 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 94.4
Write 122
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 43
106% 79.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
51.1% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 15.3
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 18
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-C Builds (Compare 772 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-C - $256

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $880
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $372WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback