Asus K53SD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus K53SD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K53SD
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '22 at 01:58
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 0.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
31% Below average
Memory 49.2
1-Core 51.8
2-Core 62.9
35% 54.6 Pts
4-Core 70.8
8-Core 105
11% 87.9 Pts
64-Core 93.6
6% 93.6 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Asus(1043 1652) 1.8GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
1.23% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 1.2
1% 1.87 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.23%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 22 23 21 25 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 57.4
Write 26.6
Mixed 18.2
SusWrite 22.3
23% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
26% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SSZ302G08-GGNED Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.3% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 11
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 5
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K53SD Builds (Compare 516 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K53SD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback