Toshiba Satellite P745

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemToshiba Satellite P745  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA POQAA
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 06 '21 at 21:28
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2620M
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 75.8
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 162
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 216
29% 215 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FC81) 2GB
Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.97% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 1.7
2% 2.73 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.97%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
884GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 365 190 8.9 315 135 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 395
Write 358
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 193
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 12.9
4K Mixed 0.4
22% 7.77 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 19.7
DQ Mixed 0.4
18% 45.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 Kingston 99U5428-040.A01G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
50.4% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite P745 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite P745

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $260
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback