MSI H110M ECO-S01 (MS-7994)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive90.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemMSI MS-7994
MotherboardMSI H110M ECO-S01 (MS-7994)  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161011
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '23 at 02:22
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 111
2-Core 223
77% 138 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 592
60% 484 Pts
64-Core 607
38% 607 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Asus(1043 83F9) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
6.35% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 9
6% 8.07 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 9.9
Splatting 8.3
7% 8.73 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.35%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 020KST17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 410 360 113 117 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 255
Mixed 341
SusWrite 254
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 38.9
146% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 213
182% 264 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP37D4U1S8ME-8X 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.3% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 9.5
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 11
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M ECO-S01 (MS-7994) Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H110M ECO-S01 (MS-7994)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $63
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback