HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT11-1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics98.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive248% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN 25L Desktop GT11-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 886B
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '22 at 15:44
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User TZA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700F
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Memory 79.1
1-Core 165
2-Core 322
100% 189 Pts
4-Core 582
8-Core 998
96% 790 Pts
64-Core 1533
95% 1533 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$253
Nvidia(10DE 2504) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.7% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 118
Parallax 120
104% 122 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 101
Splatting 88
88% 110 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 512GB SSD 512GB
442GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.16.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1334 1340 1339 1308 1270 1265 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 1,476
Write 1396
Mixed 1,176
SusWrite 1,309
302% 1,340 MB/s
4K Read 63.1
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 66.3
256% 90.4 MB/s
DQ Read 935
DQ Write 440
DQ Mixed 148
253% 507 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 248%
Great: 313%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP37D4U1S8ME-8X 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
54.8% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 14.2
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 16
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN 25L Desktop GT11-1xxx Builds (Compare 652 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 146%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 143%
UFO

System: HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT11-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $500
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback